Processing math: 0%

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Modular Function of Weight k > 2: The Eisenstein Series

MathJax TeX Test Page Let k>2 be an integer, and consider the following function defined on the upper half plane of the complex numbers: G_k(τ) = \sum_{(c,d)∈ℤ^2-(0,0)} \dfrac{1}{(cτ+d)^k} We shall prove that the series above converges absolutely for all τ in the upper half plane, and as such the summands may be permuted freely. Then, we shall prove that the series converges uniformly on compact subsets, and thus defines a holomorphic function on the upper half plane. Finally, we shall prove that G_k(τ) is weakly modular of weight k, and also G_k(τ) is bounded as \text{Im}(τ)→∞, and so defines a modular function of weight k.

Proving that the series absolutely converges for any given τ is more or less the same as showing the the same for the Weierstrass series with respect to the lattice [τ,1]; we outline the idea. One may contain the lattice points in disjoint balls of uniform size δ > 0. Since each annulus of radii R-1, R+2 has area O(R), the convergence of \sum \dfrac{1}{|cτ+d|^k} follows by comparison with the convergent series \sum_{R=1} \dfrac{1}{R^{k-1}}.

For positive real numbers A,B, let Ω = \{τ~|~|\text{Re}(τ)| ≤ A, |\text{Im}(τ)| ≥ B\}. We show G_k(τ) converges uniformly on Ω, and hence on compact subsets in general, thereby proving G_k(τ) defines a holomorphic function. We do this by showing that \sum_{(c,d)∈ℤ^2-(0,0)} σ_{c,d} converges on Ω, where σ_{c,d} = \sup_{τ∈Ω} \dfrac{1}{|cτ+d|^k} Note that this supremum is approached by bringing as close to -d as possible; when |d| is large enough, say |d| > N, this supremum is in fact achieved by letting τ be one of \pm A + Bi. Thus, we know that \sum σ_{c,d} converges when only large enough d are summed, by considering G_k(τ) converges absolutely for each τ. As for \sum_c σ_{c,d} for each fixed d with |d| ≤ N, we see σ_{c,d} ≤ \dfrac{1}{|cB|^k} = \dfrac{1}{|B|^k} \dfrac{1}{|c|^k} generally when c ≠ 0, so the aforementioned sum converges. We conclude G_k(τ) converges uniformly on Ω and is holomorphic on the upper half plane. This calculation also shows that G_k(τ) is bounded on Ω; the fact that G_k(τ) is bounded as \text{Im}(τ)→∞ will therefore follow once we show it is weakly modular, and thereby -periodic.

Consider the action of a special fractional linear transformation on the lattice L=[τ,1]; for generic integers α,β we see ατ+β↦α \dfrac{aτ+b}{cτ+d} + β = \dfrac{(aα+cβ)τ + (bα + dβ)}{cτ+d} Therefore, noting that \begin{bmatrix}a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix}^T permutes ℤ^2, we see the special linear transformation induces a bijection L→\dfrac{L}{cτ+d}. We conclude that G_k(\dfrac{aτ+b}{cτ+d}) = (cτ+d)^k G_k(τ), so G_k(τ) is weakly modular, hence fully modular by the above comment.~\square

Note: There is an error in the above proof, namely "when |d| is large enough, say |d| > N, this supremum is in fact achieved by letting τ be one of \pm A + Bi." One can instead show that there exists a constant C > 0 such that |γτ+δ| > C \cdot \sup \{|γ|,|δ|\} for all τ∈Ω and real γ, δ not both zero, implying \sum σ_{c,d} ≤ \dfrac{1}{C} \sum \dfrac{1}{(\sup \{|c|,|d|\})^k} is finite.

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Galois Correspondence of Deck Transformations (5.2)

MathJax TeX Test Page Let p : Y → X be the universal covering, with \text{Deck}(Y/X) its set of deck transformations. If G ≤ \text{Deck}(Y/X) is a subgroup, π : Y → Z is the appropriate quotient of Y by equivalence modulo G, and q : Z → X factors p through the quotient, show that q is a covering map that is Galois precisely when G is a normal subgroup of \text{Deck}(Y/X), in which case \text{Deck}(Z/X) ≅ \text{Deck}(Y/X)/G
Proof: We show q is a covering map. Throughout let bars denote passage into the quotient. Let x∈X be given. Since p is a covering map, let U be a neighborhood of x with p^{-1}(U) = ∪_{j∈J} V_j for disjoint open subsets V_j of Y with each p|V_j → U a homeomomorphism. If J is empty, then we are done. Otherwise, let V be some given V_j, and define V_g = g(V) for g∈\text{Deck}(Y/X). By virtue of the universality of p, we have p^{-1}(U) = ∪_{g∈\text{Deck}(Y/X)} V_g for disjoint open subsets V_g of Y with each p|V_g → U a homeomomorphism. If \{Gh_i\}_{i∈I} is a choice of representatives for the right cosets of G, and W_i = \overline{∪_{g∈Gh_i}V_g}, we claim q^{-1}(U) = ∪_{i∈I} W_i for disjoint open subsets W_i of W with each q|W_i → U a homeomomorphism. Indeed, each W_i is open as it is the image of a π-saturated open set in Y, and are disjoint since the V_g are disjoint. As well, it is clear that each π|h_i(V)→W_i is a homeomorphism with inverse φ_i, hence each q|W_i→U is a homeomorphism as q = p∘φ_i on W_i. Thus q is a covering map.

Suppose G is a normal subgroup of deck transformations. Then for \overline{y_0},\overline{y_1}∈Z lying in a common fiber over q, we see y_0,y_1∈Y lie in a common fiber over p, so let σ∈\text{Deck}(Y/X) be such that σ(y_0) = y_1. We define \overline{σ}(\overline{y}) = \overline{σ(y)}. This is seen to be independent of the choice of representative in y, since if g∈G, then \overline{σ(g(y))} = \overline{σ(g(σ^{-1}(σ(y))))} = \overline{g'(σ(y))} = \overline{σ(y)} for some other g'∈G since G is normal. \overline{σ} is seen to be a continuous fiber-preserving endomorphism of Z with inverse \overline{σ^{-1}}, hence \overline{σ}∈\text{Deck}(Z/X). Therefore q : Z → X is Galois, and since \overline{σ}\overline{ψ} = \overline{σψ} with \overline{σ} = 1 iff σ∈G, we have \text{Deck}(Z/X) ≅ \text{Deck}(Y/X)/G Conversely, suppose q : Z → X is Galois, with σ∈\text{Deck}(Y/X), g∈G given. We will show h = σgσ^{-1}∈G. Choose some y_0∈Y, and let σ(y_0)=y_1. Let ψ∈\text{Deck}(Z/X) be such that ψ(\overline{y_0}) = \overline{y_1}. Then both π∘σ and ψ∘π are continuous fiber-preserving maps from Y to Z (relative to p and q) sending y_0 to \overline{y_1}, thus they are equal on all of Y. Thus, \overline{σ(y)} = ψ(\overline{y}) Substituting y with g(y), we have \overline{σ(g(y))} = \overline{h(σ(y))} = ψ(\overline{g(y)}) = ψ(\overline{y}) = \overline{σ(y)} so that, since σ is a bijection and y is arbitrary, \overline{y} = \overline{h(y)} for all y∈Y. But this is to say h preserves the fibers of π; necessarily h∈G, which concludes the proof that G is normal.~\square