Proof: Recall that dim V=dim V∗ implying dim End(V)=dim End(V∗), so that it suffices to show ψ is a nonsingular linear transformation. To show linearity, we must showψ(φ1+αφ2)=ψ(φ1)+αψ(φ2)(φ1+αφ2)∗(f)=φ∗1(f)+(αφ∗2)(f) ∀f∈V∗(φ1+αφ2)∗(f)(v)=φ∗1(f)(v)+(αφ∗2)(f)(v) ∀v∈Vf∘(φ1+αφ2)(v)=f∘φ∗1(v)+f∘αφ∗2(v)which follows from the linearity of f. To show nonsingularity, suppose ψ(φ)=0, which is to say φ∗(f)=0 for all f∈V∗, which is to say φ∗(f)(v)=f∘φ(v)=0 for all v∈V. Assuming φ is nonzero implies φ(v)=∑aiei where some ak is nonzero. Letting f be the element that sends ek to 1 and all other ej to zero, we obtain a contradiction for f∘φ(v)=f(∑aiei)=ak.
Suppose n≥2 and ψ is a ring isomorphismψ(φ1∘φ2)=ψ(φ1)∘ψ(φ2)ψ(φ1∘φ2)(f)=ψ(φ1)∘ψ(φ2)(f) ∀f∈V∗f∘(φ1∘φ2)=f∘(φ2∘φ1)Choosing φ1,φ2 as n×n matrices such that φ2∘φ1=0 but φ1∘φ2 is nonzero, we can choose f that maps a single basis element involved in the nonzero image of an element v under the latter to 1 so that the equality is violated and ψ is not a ring isomorphism. Note that this approach does prove ψ is a ring isomorphism when n=1 as 1×1 matrices commute.
Let V have basis e1,...,en, so that V∗ has basis e∗1,...,e∗1, End(V) has basis eab (considered as the n×n matrix with 1 in position a,b and zeros elsewhere) and End(V∗) has basis e∗ab for 1≤a,b≤n. Define ψ:End(V)→End(V∗) by its action on the basis of End(V) via ψ(eab)=e∗ab. This extends to a linear transformation that sends basis to basis and as such is nonsingular. All that remains is to demonstrate multiplicativity. We may observe thisψ(φ1∘φ2)=ψ(φ1)∘ψ(φ2)as the composition seen as matrix multiplication remains the same through the transformation. ◻
No comments:
Post a Comment