Proof: (⇐) Let Y be paracompact, and let B={Uα} be an open cover of X. For each y∈Y, let By⊆B be a finite subcover of p−1{y}, and obtain open Vy⊆X such that p−1{y}⊆Vy⊆∪By and p(Vy)⊆Y is a neighborhood of y. Then {p(Vy)} is an open cover for Y, so let A be a locally finite open refinement covering Y. For each y∈Y, let y∈Ay∈A. We claim C={p−1(Ay)∩B | y∈Y,B∈By} is a locally finite open refinement of B covering X. It is clear C is an open refinement, and given x∈X, we have x∈p−1(y)∩B⊆p−1(Ay)∩B for some y∈Y and B∈By, therefore C covers X. As well, let U be a neighborhood of p(x) intersecting Ay for only finitely many y∈Y. Then p−1(U) is a neighborhood of x intersecting p−1(Ay) for only finitely many y∈Y, hence intersecting p−1(Ay)∩B for only finitely many pairs (y,B) when B∈By. Therefore C is locally finite and X is paracompact.
(⇒) Let X be paracompact, and let B be an open cover of Y. Then let A be a locally finite open refinement of {p−1(B) | B∈B} covering X. We claim C={p(A) | A∈A} is a locally finite refinement of B covering Y, so that since Y is regular by normality of X, Y will be paracompact by Lemma 41.3. The only nontrivial quality to check is local finiteness; given y∈Y, for each x∈p−1(y) let U be a neighborhood of x intersecting only finitely many elements of C. Since p−1(y) is compact, there exists a neighborhood about it intersecting only finitely many elements of C, and furthermore a saturated sub-neighborhood Vy of this one. Being saturated, Vy∩A=ø implies p(Vy)∩p(A)=ø for all A∈A, so that p(Vy) is a neighborhood of y intersecting only finitely many elements of C. ◻
No comments:
Post a Comment