Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/BasicLatin.js

Friday, February 13, 2015

Equivalence of Differentiability of Real Functions of Several Variables with Lame MTH254 Definition

MathJax TeX Test Page (Necessary exercise) Let f:2, fix α2, and define Δf=f(α+(Δx,Δy))f(α) given Δx,Δy. Show that the condition (1) The partial derivatives fx=fx,fy=fy exist at α and there exists ε1,ε2:2 such that Δf=fx(α)Δx+fy(α)Δy+ε1Δx+ε2Δy ε1,ε20         as  Δx,Δy0 (implicitly εi=εi(Δx,Δy)) is equivalent to the condition (2) There exists a linear transformation A:2 such that when h=(Δx,Δy), we see lim Proof: We shall use the condition—equivalent to (2)—of there existing a linear transformation A: ℝ^2→ℝ and an error term r : ℝ^2→ℝ such that Δf=Ah+r(h) \lim_{h→0} \dfrac{|r(h)|}{|h|}→0 in the proof that follows. (1)(2) Define A(Δx,Δy)=f_x(α)Δx+f_y(α)Δy, and r(Δx,Δy)=ε_1Δx+ε_2Δy. Then clearly Δf=Ah+r(h), and also \dfrac{|r(h)|}{|h|}=|ε_1\dfrac{Δx}{|h|}+ε_2\dfrac{Δy}{|h|}|≤|ε_1|+|ε_2|→0 (2)(1) Let α=(x_0,y_0). Observing the real functions x↦(x,y_0) and y↦(x_0,y), we see by application of (2) that the appropriate partial derivatives exist, and that such a linear transformation must in fact be A(Δx,Δy)=f_x(α)Δx+f_y(α)Δy. Therefore define ε_1 = \left\{ \begin{array} \{ r(h)/Δx & Δx≠0 \\ 0 & Δx=0,Δy≠0 \\ 0 & Δx,Δy=0 \end{array} \right.~~~~~ε_2 = \left\{ \begin{array} \{ 0 & Δx≠0 \\ r(h)/Δy & Δx=0,Δy≠0 \\ 0 & Δx,Δy=0 \end{array} \right. then it is clear that Δf=f_x(α)Δx+f_y(α)Δy+ε_1Δx+ε_2Δy, and observing |\dfrac{r(h)}{Δx}|≤|\dfrac{r(h)}{Δx}·\dfrac{Δx}{|h|}|=\dfrac{|r(h)|}{|h|}→0 and similarly \dfrac{r(h)}{Δy}→0 we see ε_1,ε_2→0 as Δx,Δy→0.~\square

No comments:

Post a Comment