26. Determine the Jordan canonical form of the n×n matrix over Fp whose entries are all equal to 1.
27. Determine the Jordan canonical form of the n×n matrix over Q whose diagonal entries are all equal to 0 and other entries are all 1.
28. Determine the Jordan canonical form of the n×n matrix over Fp whose diagonal entries are all equal to 0 and other entries are all 1.
Proof: When n=1 all these matrices are already in Jordan canonical form, so assume n>1.
(25) Let B=A−n and C=AB. We seecij=n∑k=1aikbkj=n∑k=1bkj=bjj+∑k=1,k≠jbkj=1−n+n−1=0so now mA(x)∣x(x−n) and since A,B≠0 we have mA(x)=x(x−n) and A is diagonalizable with ns and 0s.
Assume there are multiple ns down the diagonal of the Jordan form of A, so there are multiple x−n factors in the invariant decomposition. Letting 1a,1b∈Qn be the Q[x] generators of these summands we see x(1a) and x(1b) are linearly independent over Q. But we see A[f1...fn]=[∑fi...∑fi] so that all elements under the image of A are either zero or associate to [1...1], a contradiction. Therefore the Jordan canonical form of this matrix is the n×n matrix with a1,1=n and all other entries 0.
(26) Assume p∤n. Then as before we can conclude mA(x)=x(x−n) and that there is only one x−n invariant factor and the Jordan canonical form is as above. Assume p∣n. Then x=x−n and since A≠0 we have mA(x)=x2. Once again we see that assuming there is more than invariant factor not dividing x leads to linearly independent elements in the image of A, so that we may conclude the invariant decomposition is x,...,x,x2 and the Jordan canonical form is simply the matrix with a1,2=1 and all other entries 0.
(27) Letting A be this matrix and A′ the matrix of (25), we see A+1=A′ and thus ((x+1)−n)(x+1)=(x−n+1)(x+1)=0. As before we note there is one associativity class in the image of A′=A+1 so that there is exactly one invariant factor of x−n+1 in the decomposition, and so the Jordan canonical form is the matrix with a1,1=n−1, the other diagonal entries −1 and the other entries 0.
(28) When p∤n we have n≢0 and so x−n+1≠x+1 and the Jordan canonical form is as above. When p∣n we again notice there is one invariant factor of (x+1)2 and thus the Jordan canonical form is the matrix with a1,2=1, the diagonal entries all −1 and the other entries 0. ◻
Is it just me or does the "Jordan canonical form" sound like some kind of sequel to the Dead Sea Scrolls?
ReplyDeleteThey're actually a sequel to the rational canonical form, which sounds like a release from the latest of analytical-Aristotelian philosophy.
ReplyDeletePlease, true Aristotelians write in Αρχαία Ελληνική.
Delete