(a) If λ≠0, prove the Jordan canonical form of J2 is the Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λ2.
(b) If λ=0, prove the Jordan canonical form of J2 is two Jordan blocks of sizes m2, m2 if m is even and of sizes m−12, m+12 if m is odd.
38. Determine the necessary and sufficient conditions for a matrix over C to have a square root.
39. Let J be a Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λ over a field F with characteristic 2. Determine the Jordan canonical for for the matrix J2. Determine the necessary conditions for a matrix over F to have a square root.
Proof: We consider a more general case - determining when a matrix over F has an nth root for any natural n, first when n≠0 in F, and when n=0 in F and n is prime in Z.
(37)(a) Let T be the linear transformation of J with regard to some basis e1,...,em. We shall showJn=[λn(n0)λn−1(n1)⋯(nn)λ00⋯0λn(n0)λn−1(n1)⋱0⋯00λn(n0)⋱0⋯⋱⋯⋯⋯⋱⋯⋯]In the language of linear transformations, this is equivalent to showing Tn is the linear transformation acting on the basis byTn(ek)=k−1∑j=0λn−j(nj)ek−jThis is evident for n=1, so we prove the proposition by induction:Tn(ek)=T∘Tn−1(ek)=T(k−1∑j=0λn−1−j(n−1j)ek−j)=k−1∑j=0λn−1−j(n−1j)T(ek−j)We note at this point that T acts on the basis by T(ek)=λek+ek−1 if k>1 and T(e1)=λe1, so we may continuek−1∑j=0λn−1−j(n−1j)T(ek−j)=[k−2∑j=0(n−1j)(λn−jek−j+λn−j−1ek−j−1)]+(n−1k−1)λ(n−1)−(k−1)+1e1=λnek+[k−2∑j=1((n−1j)λn−j+(n−1j−1)λn−1−(j−1))ek−j]+((n−1k−1)λn−k+1+(n−1k−2)λn−1−(k−2))e1=λnek+[k−2∑j=1λn−j(nj)ek−j]+λn−(k−1)e1=k−1∑j=0λn−j(nj)ek−jAnd so our claim is proven. Now, since Jn−λn is an upper triangular matrix, it is nilpotent and thus mJ(x)|(x−λn)m. As well, note the nullity of Tn−λn on V; we have (Tn−λn)V is generated by λn−j(nj)em−j for 1≤j≤m−1, which arises as a linear combination of the linearly independent elements e1,...,em−1 when λ≠0, (n1)=n≠0 and so (Tn−λn)V is of rank m−1 and Tn−λn has nullity of 1. Thus there is one Jordan block in the Jordan canonical form of J with eigenvalue λn and by the minimal monomial this must be the only block, and hence the Jordan canonical form of Jn for J a Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λ≠0 is a Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λn.
(b) When λ=0, by the above we have Jn is the matrix where the i,j entry is 1 if j=i+n and all other entries are 0. Thus Tn acts on the basis by T(ek)=0 if k≤n and T(ek)=ek−n when k>n. Write m=an+b where 0≤b<n. Assume m<n so a=0: Then Jn=0 and there are m=b blocks of size 1=a+1 so the form is of the same pattern as follows when a≥1: We may see rk=m−nk when k≤a and rk=0 when k>a, where rk=dim(Tn)kV. We count the Jordan blocks by 12.3.30:ra−1−2ra+ra+1=m−n(a−1)−2(m−na)=m−na−2(m−na)+n=n−bra−2ra+1+ra+2=m−na=bThus there are n−b blocks of size a and b blocks of size a+1 (all with eigenvalue 0, remember). We count their combined dimension over F by (n−b)a+b(a+1)=na+b=m so this describes the Jordan form entirely.
38. We prove a matrix A over F wherein n≠0 and which contains all the eigenvalues of its matrices (e.g. C) has an nth root if and only if:
1) Each of its nonzero eigenvalues has an nth root in F, and
2) It is possible to divide its list of exponents of its invariant factors xk into regions with generation rules:
i) Size m containing only 1s for m<n, and
ii) Size n containing elements which all differ from each other by 1 or 0.
Lemma 1: Let G be a ring. An element g∈G has a multplicative nth root in G if and only if each of the elements in its similarity class has an nth root. Proof: (⇐) is clear, and (⇒) follows by fn=g⇒(hfh−1)n=hfnh−1=hgh−1. ◻
Lemma 2: Let A be the block matrix with blocks A1,...,An and let B be the block matrix with blocks B1,...,Bn where Ai is the same size as Bi. Then AB is the block matrix with blocks A1B1,...,AnBn. Proof: Expanding AB=(A′1+...+A′n)(B′1+...+B′n) where A′i is the block matrix in position of a matrix of size A, and similar for B′i, by viewing these individual blocks as collapses onto disjoint subspaces followed by a particular linear transformation, we see A′iB′j=0 for i≠j and A′iB′i=(AiBi)′. Therefore (A′1+...+A′n)(B′1+...+B′n)=(A1B1)′+...+(AnBn)′ is the block matrix described above. ◻
By the above lemmas and our knowledge of the Jordan canonical forms of powers of Jordan blocks, the logical equivalence now holds. A has an nth root if and only if there is a matrix for which Bn is of the same Jordan canonical form as A if and only if there is such B that is in Jordan canonical form itself (since (P−1BP)n=P−1BnP and Bn are in the same similarity class), and we see Bn has blocks each of which can be separately conjugated into Jordan canonical form giving rise to a block matrix P of conjugating blocks conjugating Bn into its Jordan canonical form as the block sum of the Jordan canonical forms of its component blocks. By the nature of how these canonical forms arise in these blocks by (37), this completes the proof.
39. The second requirement is the same as above but applies to each class of eigenvalues as well as 0, as when Aλ is the matrix in Jordan canonical form with eigenvalue λ of some fixed size, then Anλ−λn=An0, since when n is prime n|(nk) for all 0<k<n. ◻
No comments:
Post a Comment