Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Friday, August 30, 2013

Matrix Roots (12.3.37-39)

Dummit and Foote Abstract Algebra, section 12.3, exercises 37-39:

MathJax TeX Test Page 37. Let J be a Jordon block of size n with eigenvalue λC.
(a) If λ0, prove the Jordan canonical form of J2 is the Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λ2.
(b) If λ=0, prove the Jordan canonical form of J2 is two Jordan blocks of sizes m2, m2 if m is even and of sizes m12, m+12 if m is odd.
38. Determine the necessary and sufficient conditions for a matrix over C to have a square root.
39. Let J be a Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λ over a field F with characteristic 2. Determine the Jordan canonical for for the matrix J2. Determine the necessary conditions for a matrix over F to have a square root.

Proof: We consider a more general case - determining when a matrix over F has an nth root for any natural n, first when n0 in F, and when n=0 in F and n is prime in Z.

(37)(a) Let T be the linear transformation of J with regard to some basis e1,...,em. We shall showJn=[λn(n0)λn1(n1)(nn)λ000λn(n0)λn1(n1)000λn(n0)0]In the language of linear transformations, this is equivalent to showing Tn is the linear transformation acting on the basis byTn(ek)=k1j=0λnj(nj)ekjThis is evident for n=1, so we prove the proposition by induction:Tn(ek)=TTn1(ek)=T(k1j=0λn1j(n1j)ekj)=k1j=0λn1j(n1j)T(ekj)We note at this point that T acts on the basis by T(ek)=λek+ek1 if k>1 and T(e1)=λe1, so we may continuek1j=0λn1j(n1j)T(ekj)=[k2j=0(n1j)(λnjekj+λnj1ekj1)]+(n1k1)λ(n1)(k1)+1e1=λnek+[k2j=1((n1j)λnj+(n1j1)λn1(j1))ekj]+((n1k1)λnk+1+(n1k2)λn1(k2))e1=λnek+[k2j=1λnj(nj)ekj]+λn(k1)e1=k1j=0λnj(nj)ekjAnd so our claim is proven. Now, since Jnλn is an upper triangular matrix, it is nilpotent and thus mJ(x)|(xλn)m. As well, note the nullity of Tnλn on V; we have (Tnλn)V is generated by λnj(nj)emj for 1jm1, which arises as a linear combination of the linearly independent elements e1,...,em1 when λ0, (n1)=n0 and so (Tnλn)V is of rank m1 and Tnλn has nullity of 1. Thus there is one Jordan block in the Jordan canonical form of J with eigenvalue λn and by the minimal monomial this must be the only block, and hence the Jordan canonical form of Jn for J a Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λ0 is a Jordan block of size m with eigenvalue λn.

(b) When λ=0, by the above we have Jn is the matrix where the i,j entry is 1 if j=i+n and all other entries are 0. Thus Tn acts on the basis by T(ek)=0 if kn and T(ek)=ekn when k>n. Write m=an+b where 0b<n. Assume m<n so a=0: Then Jn=0 and there are m=b blocks of size 1=a+1 so the form is of the same pattern as follows when a1: We may see rk=mnk when ka and rk=0 when k>a, where rk=dim(Tn)kV. We count the Jordan blocks by 12.3.30:ra12ra+ra+1=mn(a1)2(mna)=mna2(mna)+n=nbra2ra+1+ra+2=mna=bThus there are nb blocks of size a and b blocks of size a+1 (all with eigenvalue 0, remember). We count their combined dimension over F by (nb)a+b(a+1)=na+b=m so this describes the Jordan form entirely.

38. We prove a matrix A over F wherein n0 and which contains all the eigenvalues of its matrices (e.g. C) has an nth root if and only if:

1) Each of its nonzero eigenvalues has an nth root in F, and
2) It is possible to divide its list of exponents of its invariant factors xk into regions with generation rules:
     i) Size m containing only 1s for m<n, and
     ii) Size n containing elements which all differ from each other by 1 or 0.

Lemma 1: Let G be a ring. An element gG has a multplicative nth root in G if and only if each of the elements in its similarity class has an nth root. Proof: () is clear, and () follows by fn=g(hfh1)n=hfnh1=hgh1. 

Lemma 2: Let A be the block matrix with blocks A1,...,An and let B be the block matrix with blocks B1,...,Bn where Ai is the same size as Bi. Then AB is the block matrix with blocks A1B1,...,AnBn. Proof: Expanding AB=(A1+...+An)(B1+...+Bn) where Ai is the block matrix in position of a matrix of size A, and similar for Bi, by viewing these individual blocks as collapses onto disjoint subspaces followed by a particular linear transformation, we see AiBj=0 for ij and AiBi=(AiBi). Therefore (A1+...+An)(B1+...+Bn)=(A1B1)+...+(AnBn) is the block matrix described above. 

By the above lemmas and our knowledge of the Jordan canonical forms of powers of Jordan blocks, the logical equivalence now holds. A has an nth root if and only if there is a matrix for which Bn is of the same Jordan canonical form as A if and only if there is such B that is in Jordan canonical form itself (since (P1BP)n=P1BnP and Bn are in the same similarity class), and we see Bn has blocks each of which can be separately conjugated into Jordan canonical form giving rise to a block matrix P of conjugating blocks conjugating Bn into its Jordan canonical form as the block sum of the Jordan canonical forms of its component blocks. By the nature of how these canonical forms arise in these blocks by (37), this completes the proof.

39. The second requirement is the same as above but applies to each class of eigenvalues as well as 0, as when Aλ is the matrix in Jordan canonical form with eigenvalue λ of some fixed size, then Anλλn=An0, since when n is prime n|(nk) for all 0<k<n. 

No comments:

Post a Comment