Processing math: 100%

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Limit Points and Housekeeping (2.6-9)

Walter Rudin Principles of Mathematical Analysis, chapter 2, exercises 6-9:

MathJax TeX Test Page 6. Let E be the set of all limit points of a set E. Prove that E is closed. Prove that E=¯E. Generally, is it true that E=E?
7. Let An be subsets of a metric space for n.
(a) If Bn=ni=0Ai prove that ¯Bn=ni=0¯Ai.
(b) If B=An prove that ¯B¯An.
Show that this inclusion can be proper.
8. Is every point of every open set E2 a limit point of E? Answer the same question for closed sets in 2.
9. Let E denote the set of all interior points of a set E, called the interior of E.
(a) Prove that E is always open.
(b) Prove that E is open iff E=E.
(c) If GE and G is open, show GE.
(d) Prove Ec=¯Ec.
(e) Does E=¯E?
(f) Does ¯E=¯E?

Proof: Lemma 1: Let Ai be a union of subsets of a metric space. Then (Ai)Ai, and there is equality when the union is finite. Proof: The direction is clear since limit points of a subset are limit points of the whole set, so it remains to show when the union is finite. To wit, let p be a limit point of Ai. For each i, let ri=inf {r | AiNr(p){p}}. If ri>0 for all i then since the indices are finite choose some r such that 0<r<mini ri and we would have Nr(p)(Ai)={p} and p is not a limit point, a contradiction. Hence ri=0 for some i, therefore p is a limit point of Ai.

6. We now show EE so that E is closed. We have in fact already seen this, since a limit of limit points is a limit of the original points, since they lie arbitrarily close to these limit points. Now, by the lemma we see ¯E=(EE)=EE=E. Finally, let E=(0,1). We see E={0,1} and E= so that generally E need not equal E.

7. (a) We see¯Bn=BnBn=(ni=0Ai)(ni=0Ai)=(ni=0Ai)(ni=0Ai)=ni=0(AiAi)=ni=0¯Aiwith a containment between the appropriately modified terms three and four if the union is infinite. When Ai={1/(i+1)} for all i, we see ¯B contains 0, whereas ¯Ai=Ai does not.

8. 2 contains no isolated points, and every point of an open set is interior, and since interior and non-isolated implies limit point, every point of an open set in 2 is a limit point. Clearly, {0} is a closed set for which 0 is not a limit point.

9. Lemma 2: E=¯Ecc. Proof: () Suppose pE. Then pE so pEc and also pEc, hence p¯Ec so p¯Ecc. () Suppose p¯Ecc, so p¯Ec=EcEc implying pE and p is not a limit point of Ec, i.e. p is an interior point of E and is contained in E.

(a) This follows from the lemma since ¯Ec is closed.

(b) This will follow from (c).

(c) Assume GE is open and GE. Then G=GE is an open set contained in E with inclusions E=¯EccGE. We then observe EcGc¯Ec are inclusions with Gc closed containing E, yet ¯Ec is supposed to be the smallest closed set containing Ec, a contradiction.

(d) This was shown in the lemma.

(e) Let E={0}1. Then E=E yet ¯E==. Hence, generally, E¯E.

(f) Let E={0}. Then ¯E=E and ¯E=¯=. Hence, generally, ¯E¯E. 

No comments:

Post a Comment