7. Let An be subsets of a metric space for n∈ℕ.
(a) If Bn=∪ni=0Ai prove that ¯Bn=∪ni=0¯Ai.
(b) If B=∪An prove that ¯B⊇∪¯An.
Show that this inclusion can be proper.
8. Is every point of every open set E⊆ℝ2 a limit point of E? Answer the same question for closed sets in ℝ2.
9. Let E∘ denote the set of all interior points of a set E, called the interior of E.
(a) Prove that E∘ is always open.
(b) Prove that E is open iff E∘=E.
(c) If G⊆E and G is open, show G⊆E∘.
(d) Prove E∘c=¯Ec.
(e) Does E∘=¯E∘?
(f) Does ¯E=¯E∘?
Proof: Lemma 1: Let ∪Ai be a union of subsets of a metric space. Then (∪Ai)′⊇∪A′i, and there is equality when the union is finite. Proof: The ⊇ direction is clear since limit points of a subset are limit points of the whole set, so it remains to show ⊆ when the union is finite. To wit, let p be a limit point of ∪Ai. For each i, let ri=inf {r∈ℝ | Ai∩Nr(p)−{p}≠∅}. If ri>0 for all i then since the indices are finite choose some r such that 0<r<mini ri and we would have Nr(p)∩(∪Ai)={p} and p is not a limit point, a contradiction. Hence ri=0 for some i, therefore p is a limit point of Ai.
6. We now show E″⊆E′ so that E′ is closed. We have in fact already seen this, since a limit of limit points is a limit of the original points, since they lie arbitrarily close to these limit points. Now, by the lemma we see ¯E′=(E∪E′)′=E′∪E″=E′. Finally, let E=(0,1). We see E′={0,1} and E″=∅ so that generally E′ need not equal E″.
7. (a) We see¯Bn=Bn∪B′n=(∪ni=0Ai)∪(∪ni=0Ai)′=(∪ni=0Ai)∪(∪ni=0A′i)=∪ni=0(Ai∪A′i)=∪ni=0¯Aiwith a ⊇ containment between the appropriately modified terms three and four if the union is infinite. When Ai={1/(i+1)} for all i, we see ¯B contains 0, whereas ∪¯Ai=∪Ai does not.
8. ℝ2 contains no isolated points, and every point of an open set is interior, and since interior and non-isolated implies limit point, every point of an open set in ℝ2 is a limit point. Clearly, {0} is a closed set for which 0 is not a limit point.
9. Lemma 2: E∘=¯Ecc. Proof: (⊆) Suppose p∈E∘. Then p∈E so p∉Ec and also p∉Ec′, hence p∉¯Ec so p∈¯Ecc. (⊇) Suppose p∈¯Ecc, so p∉¯Ec=Ec∪Ec′ implying p∈E and p is not a limit point of Ec, i.e. p is an interior point of E and is contained in E.
(a) This follows from the lemma since ¯Ec is closed.
(b) This will follow from (c).
(c) Assume G⊆E is open and G⊈E∘. Then G′=G∪E∘ is an open set contained in E with inclusions E∘=¯Ecc⊂G′⊆E. We then observe Ec⊆G′c⊂¯Ec are inclusions with G′c closed containing E, yet ¯Ec is supposed to be the smallest closed set containing Ec, a contradiction.
(d) This was shown in the lemma.
(e) Let E=ℝ−{0}⊆ℝ1. Then E∘=E yet ¯E∘=ℝ∘=ℝ. Hence, generally, E∘≠¯E∘.
(f) Let E={0}. Then ¯E=E and ¯E∘=¯∅=∅. Hence, generally, ¯E≠¯E∘. ◻
No comments:
Post a Comment