(b) Repeat (a) for the equivalence relation x0×y0∼x1×y1 if x20+y20=x21+y21 6. Let ℝK denote the topology of ℝ granted by the basis of the usual intervals (a,b) and also the intervals (a,b)−K where K={1/n | n∈ℤ+}. Let Y be the quotient space induced by collapsing K to a point, and let p:ℝK→Y be the quotient map.
(a) Show ℝk is T1 non-Hausdorff.
(b) Show p×p:ℝ2K→Y2 is not a quotient map.
Proof: (4)(a,b) The two equivalence relations are those induced by the functions f(x,y)=x+y2 onto ℝ and g(x,y)=x2+y2 onto [0,∞), respectively. As these are both surjective, continuous maps, it suffices by Corollary 22.3(a) to prove that these functions are quotient maps. It will do to verify that they are open; as such, we observe their actions on the basis elements f((a,b)×(c,d))={(a,b+d2):c≤0(a+c2,b+d2):c>0 To note that g is open, note that in ℝ and hence in [0,∞) the addition of two open intervals is open, and that the squaring map on (a,b) is [0,max{a2,b2}) if a<0<b, and (a2,b2) if 0<a<b and (b2,a2) if a<b<0.
(6)(a) We note that since each point in ℝK constitutes a closed set, and K is closed (every point not contained in K has a neighborhood (a,b)−K not intersecting K), that consequently every point in Y constitutes a closed set, and thus is T1. Now, assume open neighborhoods U0,UK of 0,K∈Y respectively. Then p−1(U0) is a neighborhood in ℝK of 0 not intersecting K, so that p−1(U0)=(a,b)−K for some a<0<b. Let n be such that 1/n<b; then since p−1(UK) is a neighborhood of K, we may assume 1/n∈(c,d) for some 0<c<1/n<d; choose some e∈(c,1/n)−K so that f(e)∈U0∩UK and U0 and UK are not disjoint.
(b) We first show that the diagonal D={x×y | x=y}⊆Y2 is not closed, particularly that 0×K is a limit point. To this end, assume a basis neighborhood U0×UK of 0×K not intersecting D; this would imply disjoint neighborhoods U0,UK about 0,K respectively, which is impossible by the above. However, if S is the (closed) diagonal of ℝ2K, then (p×p)−1(D)=S∪(K×K) is closed in ℝ2K so that p×p isn't a quotient map. ◻
No comments:
Post a Comment