Processing math: 100%

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Restrictions of Groups of Small Order (6.2.18-20)

Dummit and Foote Abstract Algebra, section 6.2, exercises 18-20:
MathJax TeX Test Page 18. Prove |G|=36n2=1n3=1.
19. Prove |G|=12 H(HG|H|=6)GA4.
20. Prove |G|=24 g(gG|g|=6)GS4.

Proof: (18) Sylow analysis reveals:n2{3,9}     n3=4Let G act by left multiplication on the four cosets of NG(P3)=P3; the kernel N of this action is the largest normal subgroup of G contained in P3. Since P3G and N=1 allows G isomorphic passage into S4 of order 24, we must have |N|=3. We have |G/N|=12, so there is either a normal Sylow 2-subgroup or a normal Sylow 3-subgroup of G/N. Assuming the latter, we have K/NG/N is of order 3, so that its preimage K is of order 9 and normal in G, a contradiction. Therefore let K/NG/N be of order 4 so that KG is of order 12. It contains some Sylow 2-subgroup of G, and by its normality it contains all of them, so n2=3. Let K act by left multiplication on the three cosets of P3 it contains; once again, we must have a normal subgroup T of order 2 in K. This can only be the 2-core of K, which is characteristic in K, and now normal in G. We have TN is a normal subgroup of order 6, so that P3(TN) is a subgroup; since P3TN and P3TN=1 implies P3(TN) is a subgroup of order 54, we must have |P3TN|=3 and P3(TN) is a subgroup of order 18. This subgroup is normal by its index, contains a Sylow 3-subgroup and thus contains all of them, and yet Sylow purports n3=1. 

(19) Since GA4 by assumption, we have n3=1. Take x of order 2 and we have  x P3 is a subgroup of order 6. 

(20) We have:n2{1,3}     n3{1,4}If n3=4, then letting G act on the cosets of P3 allows isomorphic passage into S4 so that by order GS4. In addition, assume n2=1; then G=P2P3P2×P3. If Z(P2)=P2, then Z(G)Z(P2)×Z(P3)=P2×P3, so that G is abelian and the elements x and y of orders 2 and 3 respectively combine for a product xy of order 6. If |Z(P2)|=2 (the only other option for Z(P2)), then Z(P2) char P2G so that Z(P2)G and now Z(P2)P3Z6. Ultimately, n2=3. Since 31mod22 we have P2Q2 of order 4; by exercise 13, we must have NG(P2Q2)=G so that P2Q2G, and by 4.5.37 P2Q2 is contained in every Sylow 2-subgroup, so that the sum of the distinct elements of order 2, 4, and 8 can be explicitly calculated; there is the intersection point of order 4 minus the identity, and the three Sylow 3-subgroups that each provide 4 unique elements (lest the intersection between two distinct Sylow 2-subgroups be greater than 4, an impossibility), yielding 15 such elements. Comparing this with the following chart of possible orders of elements that can be determined thus far:
we invariably end up with only 18 elements of G, a contradiction. 

No comments:

Post a Comment