19. Prove |G|=12 ∧∄H(H≤G∧|H|=6)⇒G≅A4.
20. Prove |G|=24 ∧∄g(g∈G∧|g|=6)⇒G≅S4.
Proof: (18) Sylow analysis reveals:n2∈{3,9} n3=4Let G act by left multiplication on the four cosets of NG(P3)=P3; the kernel N of this action is the largest normal subgroup of G contained in P3. Since P3⋬G and N=1 allows G isomorphic passage into S4 of order 24, we must have |N|=3. We have |G/N|=12, so there is either a normal Sylow 2-subgroup or a normal Sylow 3-subgroup of G/N. Assuming the latter, we have K/N⊴G/N is of order 3, so that its preimage K is of order 9 and normal in G, a contradiction. Therefore let K/N⊴G/N be of order 4 so that K⊴G is of order 12. It contains some Sylow 2-subgroup of G, and by its normality it contains all of them, so n2=3. Let K act by left multiplication on the three cosets of P3 it contains; once again, we must have a normal subgroup T of order 2 in K. This can only be the 2-core of K, which is characteristic in K, and now normal in G. We have TN is a normal subgroup of order 6, so that P3(TN) is a subgroup; since P3≰TN and P3∩TN=1 implies P3(TN) is a subgroup of order 54, we must have |P3∩TN|=3 and P3(TN) is a subgroup of order 18. This subgroup is normal by its index, contains a Sylow 3-subgroup and thus contains all of them, and yet Sylow purports n3=1. ◻
(19) Since G≇A4 by assumption, we have n3=1. Take x of order 2 and we have ⟨ x ⟩P3 is a subgroup of order 6. ◻
(20) We have:n2∈{1,3} n3∈{1,4}If n3=4, then letting G act on the cosets of P3 allows isomorphic passage into S4 so that by order G≅S4. In addition, assume n2=1; then G=P2P3≅P2×P3. If Z(P2)=P2, then Z(G)≅Z(P2)×Z(P3)=P2×P3, so that G is abelian and the elements x and y of orders 2 and 3 respectively combine for a product xy of order 6. If |Z(P2)|=2 (the only other option for Z(P2)), then Z(P2) char P2⊴G so that Z(P2)⊴G and now Z(P2)P3≅Z6. Ultimately, n2=3. Since 3≢1mod22 we have P2∩Q2 of order 4; by exercise 13, we must have NG(P2∩Q2)=G so that P2∩Q2⊴G, and by 4.5.37 P2∩Q2 is contained in every Sylow 2-subgroup, so that the sum of the distinct elements of order 2, 4, and 8 can be explicitly calculated; there is the intersection point of order 4 minus the identity, and the three Sylow 3-subgroups that each provide 4 unique elements (lest the intersection between two distinct Sylow 2-subgroups be greater than 4, an impossibility), yielding 15 such elements. Comparing this with the following chart of possible orders of elements that can be determined thus far:
No comments:
Post a Comment